Because we care!
Possible 75% cancer mortality reduction with Vitamin D
Filed under: breast cancer health

2 Possible 75% cancer mortality reduction with Vitamin DIn a new study, researchers at the Moores Cancer Center and Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, UC San Diego used a complex personal prediction model to determine that intake of vitamin D3 and calcium would prevent 58,000 new cases of breast cancer and 49,000 new cases of colorectal cancer annually in the US and Canada. The researchers model also predicted that 75% of deaths from these cancers could be prevented with sufficient intake of vitamin D3 and calcium. Dr. Cedric Garland, UCSD School of Medicine, lead researcher on the study discusses the implications of this finding and the proposed actions. Series: Vitamin D Deficiency – Treatment and Diagnosis [Health and Medicine] [Show ID: 16454]

Duration : 0:5:36


Save the Boobs! Detect Breast Cancer Sooner with Thermography

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Technorati Tags: breast, cancer, colorectal, health, prevention, vitamin

admin @ 9:44 am

25 Comments for 'Possible 75% cancer mortality reduction with Vitamin D'

  1.  
    JonThm
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    there is an …
    there is an antibody pill to ALL cancers.

  2.  
    georgpetur
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    That is where Codex …
    That is where Codex Alimentarius comes in to play.

  3.  
    closerlooker
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    The problem is, we …
    The problem is, we no longer live in a natural world, so natural selection isn’t what it used to be. Maybe the natural levels of vitamin D would have sufficed to protect us if it weren’t for all the toxins making us sick nowadays.

  4.  
    maryellen728
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    Vitamin can not be …
    Vitamin can not be patented by drug companies because it’s a naturally occurring hormone, not a true vitamin.
    I would usually agree with your healthy skepticism. Vitamin D is cheap & not patentable. Drug companies hate that!

  5.  
    k3456789
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    trader joes has a …
    trader joes has a cheap vit D3 for $6 without any chemicals magnesium sterate etc
    u need about 35-40 units per pound of body weight in the winter

  6.  
    wmolina9157
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    Everyone go check …
    Everyone go check out my videos. I have many great products that can give you a healthier lifestyle. Our products are great and they can change your life. Chech out my channel now.

  7.  
    fntime
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    After the ’sane …
    After the ’sane humans laugh’, I can then
    turn to you!

    Paddy, you sound like your in your cups!
    Always remember, it is no crime to be
    stupid, but there are no reasons why you
    must ‘advertise’ it to the world.

    Vitamin D cost $10 for about a 2 month
    supply. Drugs used in chemo theraphy
    $7000-1000.

    I finally realize why my great grandfather
    left Ireland and would not go back. If the
    Irish in Ireland are a dumb as you,
    then I don’t think I’d want to visit either.

  8.  
    smgill21
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    You said “drug …
    You said “drug companies don’t sell vitamins”. lie back and relax while sane humans laugh.

  9.  
    Ivanuthername
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    “Mad dogs and ….

    “Mad dogs and ….

    The medical community now recommends levels … not reached by many tanned, outdoorsy people.

    To stay above the recommended minimum of 75-150 nmol/L, we must take supplements. Yet even dietary supplementation seems to be countered within the body.

    It looks like natural selection has aimed for an optimal vitamin D level substantially lower than the recommended minimum of 75-150 nmol/L. This in turn implies some kind of disadvantage above the optimal level.” Early death?

  10.  
    tranmarketing
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    actually, 40-6% of …
    actually, 40-6% of Americans are Vitamin D deficient!

  11.  
    fntime
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    Drug companies …
    Drug companies don’t sell vitamins,
    not enough money to be made. Potentially
    most people shouldn’t lack vitamin D,
    but they do. I don’t drink milk, I don’t go
    out in the sun.
    Also, the 400 mg daily requirement is
    too low.
    Vitamin D supplements are avialable
    2 months supply for less than $10
    hardly anyone is getting rich.

    If you don’t want to take vitamins, hey, it’s
    a free country, but your comment is wrong
    and not well thought out.

  12.  
    smgill21
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    This looks like a …
    This looks like a great way to make money off human suffering, by selling a vitamin most people don’t lack. I wonder what drug company sponsored this video…

  13.  
    amadpianist
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    Thank you again
    Thank you again

  14.  
    amadpianist
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    I enjoy my approach …
    I enjoy my approach towards getting quality information. If I had been polite I would have got nothing, but because your dislike of my attitude I get 3 interesting facts and 3 further things to read, thank you very much, sir.

  15.  
    amadpianist
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    Sounds like a …
    Sounds like a cushy job!

  16.  
    ECHutchinson
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    visit

    visit
    grassrootshealth net
    under DOCUMENTATION tab

    “Dose-Response of Vitamin D and a Mechanism for Prevention of Cancer”
    here Garland et al show some of the evidence they rely on. But as he has been researching this issue for over 30yrs it’s only a fraction of the evidence available.

  17.  
    ECHutchinson
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    see
    “Targeting …

    see
    “Targeting energy metabolism in brain cancer with calorically restricted ketogenic diets.”

    and

    “Role of glucose and ketone bodies in the metabolic control of experimental brain cancer.”

    Combine that approach with the NATURAL vitamin D status our DNA evolved with while living naked outdoors and you have the potential for assisting current cancer treatments and reducing cancer incidence.

    Garland on Utube

    “Vitamin D and Cancer Prevention”

    Trump

    “Connection with Vitamin D and Cancer”

  18.  
    ECHutchinson
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    The fuel our brains …
    The fuel our brains evolved to live on is fat. Before agriculture there wasn’t a readily available supply of carbohydrates throughout the year.

    Search for

    “Higher serum vitamin D concentrations are associated with longer leukocyte telomere length in women.”

    Higher vitamin D concentrations, easily modifiable through nutritional supplementation, are associated with longer telomeres, which underscores the potentially beneficial effects of this hormone on aging and age-related diseases.

  19.  
    ThePregnancySlaves
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    Once you accept Dr. …
    Once you accept Dr. Beard’s supposition concerning Amygdalin as being the only substance that can turn off the healing process by dumping cyanide on errant healing/malignant cells then no other theory has merit. Scurvy is avoided and cured with vitamin C. One could argue that iron and manganese are important to scurvy sufferers too, but: without citric acid a patient absolutely cannot survive scurvy regardless of how nutrient-rich his diet is.
    I have anecdotal evidence fr. my family.

  20.  
    amadpianist
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    75% eh? That means …
    75% eh? That means he took into account at least 4 factors. Hardcore.

  21.  
    amadpianist
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    Eating some raw …
    Eating some raw fruit and veg is important, sure, but it aint going to cure a 3 ounce brain tumour. God.

  22.  
    amadpianist
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    I eat 5g of vitamin …
    I eat 5g of vitamin C every day and nothing bad ever happened to me aahflabourvourn!

  23.  
    amadpianist
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    You also starve …
    You also starve your brain and end up posting comments like that.

    Your life span is largely determined by genetics – your diet can’t alter the length of you telomeres!

  24.  
    ECHutchinson
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    I think you don’t …
    I think you don’t have to eat a raw diet.
    I think a low carbohydrate, low glycemic index, ketogenic, diet will achieve the outcome.
    Cut out anything ending in OSE
    fructose lactose glucose sucrose dextrose etc and you starve cancer.

  25.  
    ECHutchinson
    November 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
     

    “Vitamin D cancer ” …
    “Vitamin D cancer “pubmed search returns 5377 papers
    “vitamin B17″ Cancer” returns 75 papers
    there is a huge amount of research demonstrating that correcting vitamin D status will prevent many cancers and improve the prognosis .
    b17 may be relevant but we now know for certain that low D3 is implicated at every stage of cancer so it is absolutely certain that correcting D3 insufficiency will improve prognosis or reduce incidence risk.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Instruction for comments :

You can use these tags:
XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



RSS Feed for comments | TrackBack URI

 
Theme by Robert